What
really stuck me in Shawna Hohendoorf’s presentation was her discussion of the
ways she copes with working and developing close relationships with people at
such high risk of violence and death. What I really appreciated was her
understanding that these women can and do function in society without her and
they have a great resiliency to survive. I found this a wonderful way to manage
working with women in such a dangerous industry because I think a lot of the
discourse around sex work often strips these women of their autonomy;
specifically the debate surrounding the oppression and exploitation of women
that is inherent, or not, when one sells their body.
In
another class I recently watched the documentary “Buying Sex” which explores
the debate within Canada over the decriminalization of selling sex. One side
argues that all women who participate in sex work are oppressed and no woman
would freely choose this form of work. The other side argues that ones’
decision to participate in the sex work industry is a free choice and therefore
the laws need to work to protect these women, rather than harm them. While like
Hohendoorf I agree that the issue of sex work is an extremely complex one, I
believe that arguing that one can never freely choose to participate in sex
work erases the autonomy of these women.
This
is why I struggled with Hohendoorf’s discussion of the desperate need in Canada
to educate children and prevent sex work. While Canada has “adopted” the Nordic
model we have not actually worked to help women exit the sex work industry. I
am not arguing that either of these things are unimportant nor am I arguing
that the government should not intervene to help women who want to exit the
industry, rather, what I am trying to say is that deciding that one can never
choose to be a sex worker removes any agency from these women and further
marginalizes them. Clearly there are factors that contribute to ones likelihood
of becoming a sex worker, such as Aboriginal background, trans identification,
or low economic status. However, denying sex workers the ability to choose
their profession is one more way the rest of society contributes to the
stigmatization of the sex work industry. Perhaps the realization that people
may actually choose this form of work may combat the stigma and devaluation of
the industry. That is why I really appreciated Hohendoorf’s assertion that the
women she works with are autonomous individuals with a great ability to
survive.
I also agree that denying sex work as a profession which some women choose to enter into removes their agency. Though I personally still believe those who choose sex work do so from a place of desperation. Whether it be for survival or monetary profit, just like any occupation, people choose it for their own personal reasons. Without repeating much of what you have already said, I was most struck by Shawna’s assertion that Kindered House does not exist to save sex workers. It is in fact a resource centre which women can freely choose to use, enter, or return to. Which contrasts greatly with many other organizations which seek first to eradicate prostitution by helping individuals. Therefore amny other organizations alienate women who choose to continue sex work for whatever purpose.
ReplyDeleteIn an interesting example, Cuba “eliminated” sex work after their revolution of 1959, which pushed out all American influences including the mafia. In more practical terms the government found all the sex workers and rehabilitated them by offering free higher education and healthcare among other resources. Furthermore they implemented free university, free healthcare, and laws for equal rates of hiring for women and men. All this was to eradicate the need for sex work in a socialist state. Yet with the current flow of foreign tourism into Cuba many men and women have freely choose to engage in sex work. It is a job much more affordable than any state paid profession yet deeply stigmatized for its political symbolism.
I utilize this example simply to highlight a different angle on the discussion around agency and sex work. Often times western organizations view sex work as a symptom of poverty without considering the nuanced reasons people choose prostitution. Furthermore how can an organization that is based on the eradication of sex work establish a truly equal relationship with people who may not want to give up their job for whatever reason?