In the introduction to Are
Prisons Obsolete? Angela Davis discusses the impact of “tough on crime” politics
on prison populations within the Regan era. According to Davis this firm
approach to crime was intended to keep communities crime-free while in reality
this “led not to safer communities, but, rather, to even larger prison populations”
(12). Characteristic of this “tough on crime” stance is the implementation of
mandatory minimums and three strike laws. These laws disproportionately affect
people of colour in both the United States and Canada. We can look at the Safe
Streets Community Act and s.718.2(e) of the Canadian criminal code to
demonstrate the unequal effects of being “tough on crime”.
In 1996 Canadian parliament amended s.718.2(e) to include two
specific components. The first applies to all Canadians; it directs judges to
consider all other possible sanctions beside prison upon sentencing. The second
component, the Gladue Provision, applies only to Aboriginal people and it
directs judges to consider the unique position of the Aboriginal population
within Canada as a result of the continued trauma of colonization. S.718.2(e)
did not reduce prison rates as was intended. One explanation of this is the
emergence of The Safe Streets and Communities Act, which imposed mandatory
minimum prison sentences for a variety of drug offences. This means that judges
can no longer consider the individual circumstance of the perpetrator,
completely nullifying the Gladue Provision.
Aboriginals are overrepresented within Canadian prisons as
the result of a multitude of factors; the nullification of the Gladue Provision
by mandatory minimums is just one example. This got me thinking about Canada’s
declaration of itself as a multicultural nation while requiring the continued
oppression of Indigenous women as discussed by Audra Simpson. While on paper s.718.2(e)
espouses the effort to recognize the oppression of Indigenous persons and to
reduce prison populations, this often cannot actually be carried out because of
contradictory legislation. Therefore Canada appears to be making an effort to
correct the overrepresentation of Aboriginal persons within the prison
industry, but this overrepresentation is not decreasing, it is actually
increasing. Similar to the situation of black women in the United States, Aboriginal
women are the fastest growing population within Canadian prisons. This
incarceration of huge numbers of Aboriginal women is another way the state can
enforce violence on Aboriginal women and remove them from society. Prisons
assist in the wiping out of Indigenous women, which, as Simpson argues, is a
requirement of the state.
No comments:
Post a Comment