Tuesday 20 October 2015

The Rape Script

I found the rape script presented by Sharon Marcus troubling. I never enjoy reading things that take away the idea of human agency, because from my experience, while there are patterns that occur through our common socialization, human agency is an actor far more than scripts attribute it to be. It enlists people to play the part, to portray certain characteristics, and creates a solution to the problem. In this case, the parts are the weak and fragile feminine victim who will experience the rape, and the dominant aggressive male perpetrator who will execute this situation. For Marcus, this script can only be interrupted by a female character who is willing to speak up, and physically react in order to disturb the script that would continue to take place if the roles were followed. Yet the problem with this 'simple' solution of the feminine subject reacting to her aggressor instead of maintaining her passive stance, is that human actions sometimes do not act in the way they are 'supposed' to. 

For me, I see Marcus' understanding of rape as a script as an easy way to circumnavigate rape myths while also reinforcing them when they (the survivors) do not follow her solution to disturbing the script. I find Marcus' solution more so victim blaming then helpful in preventing rape. I am no longer ready to accept that rape, or anything in our lives, can be done according to a script, especially one so cis-heteronormative. 

The other day I read an opinion piece about how the author saw the way we interpret and create narratives around the after-math of sexual assault damaging. That, by creating only one narrative around how a victim must experience the aftermath of their assault, as well as how this must affect their behaviour. I would agree that this is damaging. While this narrative rings true for many people - and I am in no way trying to refute it, or try to say that anyone's experience is invalid, it is just that having one way to expect survivors to feel after their experience is limiting. It invalidates so many other situations, experiences, stories and feelings and again just creates another script. 

Society needs to let go of it's scripts and myths that build up, tear down, restructure and create what rape is supposed to look like. Rape is silencing enough without societal scripts boxing survivors in.

2 comments:

  1. I agree with what you’re bringing up here, Daniella, and I think it’s an important point to touch on. I don’t think that circumstances of rape and sexual assault will ever have an easy 3 step solution, and it may take a while before they are any resolutions to the many, many problems surrounding sexual assault. While some strong feminist individuals try to rationalize rape and come up with the key answer to the problem, it is a counteractive way of thinking. Although doing research and providing heavy arguments around a certain way to “fix” this “rape problem" is in good intentions, it instead works to box in countless experiences and invalidate many survivor’s personal histories. Translating complicated and traumatic events and experiences into one single formulated script, while attempting to be productive, is quite the opposite. In my eyes it’s almost offensive. Blanket solutions don’t work, and the mere construction of them is enough to undermine the personal circumstances of so many.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Daniella!

    I absolutely agree with the fact that Marcus' rape scripts are extremely limiting in terms of what survivors are "allowed" to experience. Something that came up today in class was Wendy Brown's problematic idea that victimization becomes entrenched in identity the more feminists and survivors speak out about it as a collective, which Mardorossian refutes on the grounds that "collective enunciation" actually politicizes survivor experiences (764). I think that MAYBE Marcus' rape scripts could be viewed as trying to add to that collective enunciation, trying to politicize the act of rape as structural rather than a problem lying within individuals, even though her solution to disrupting the scripts does, confusingly, require the victim to take charge of the situation themselves. In no way am I attempting to argue that Marcus' rape scripts are more useful than they are problematic (because I don't believe this), but I just wanted to bring this up.

    Thanks!

    ReplyDelete