Friday 2 October 2015

Sexual Harassment/Assault in the Service Industry


           What I like most about both Truitt’s blog post and the Weiss article was the fact that they touched on very important issues about rape culture, and how we can close some of the gaps of the discourse surrounding rape. As Truitt mentions, looking at the phenomenon of rape in a one sided way, “it’s easy and understandable to slip into essentialist language when talking about the issue, to paint all victims as women and all perpetrators as men. By missing parts of the reality, we’ve left space for folks like Men’s Rights Activists to fill” (Truitt, 2013). While Weiss’ article attempts to remove this space and put research into an area that desperately needs it, she fails to acknowledge the very different experiences of men and women when it comes to instances of unwanted sexual touching, and the difference in how society has taught men and women to react to these instances.
            What I found most problematic about the Weiss article were some of the victim’s responses that were used to describe men’s experience with sexual assault, and definitely had to “check myself” many times as Randi described in class. While defining sexual assault in “examining men’s sexual victimization experiences,” (Weiss, 2010), Weiss states that “NCVS narrative also reveal that men are victimized by a broad range of sexual assaults that include incidents in which they are grabbed or touched “inappropriately,” sexually threatened, or even “flashed” (Weiss, 2010). What I find troubling about including being touched “inappropriately” or being “flashed” is that many women deal with instances like this quite often. I am in no way attempting to minimize these men’s experiences, because no one should be touched or grabbed if they do not welcome it, but if we are to label inappropriate grabbing and touching as sexual assault then the statistics for women who have been sexually assaulted would sky rocket.
            While these are not Canadian statistics, MSNBC did a study on sexual harassment in the restaurant industry and found “found ‘endemic’ levels of harassment, with more than 90% of women working in restaurants as tipped employees dealing with it in some form” (MSNBC, 2014). As someone who works in the service industry, these numbers do not surprise me. Being “grabbed or touched inappropriately” is a regular Friday/Saturday night, with past Managers explaining that “I should take it as a compliment” or, “He’s a regular and he tips well, just deal with it.”  The report also found that “uniforms play a huge role in setting the tone in a restaurant,” (MSNBC, 2014) and that more revealing uniforms tended to bring about sexual harassment. In light of this, it is not atypical, and I would argue that it is the norm, to see female servers dressed in as little clothing as possible. Drawing from the Bar that I currently work at, the managers have set the bar low for sexualizing their employees as “G.I. Joe and his Hoes” will be the costumes for our servers this upcoming Halloween.
            While I think that Weiss’ article attempts to close the gap that Truitt speaks about in her blog, and covers a topic that truly needs more research done on it, I feel that some of her descriptions could be stretching it. Yes we need to tell men that this is not okay when done to them, conversely, we need to teach men that it is not okay when they do the same to women. Most importantly, we need to continue to tell women that being grabbed or touched inappropriately is not something that they should have to put up with in their everyday lives.

3 comments:

  1. I have been thinking of the practice of tipping myself recently and, in light of Karah’s post, have noticed an unfortunate parallel with her comments on normalized groping and once of the stories described in Campbell’s “From thinking to feeling” [and I do lament that there is a similarity].
    The service industry both encourages and monetizes young women’s complacency through tipping. Not only do they clearly demean women with comments about their cloths and the way they wear their uniforms (having heard from countless women) but the practice of tipping encourages them to accept brazen, lude and inappropriate behaviour from clientele. Somehow the presence of alcohol has permitted employers to overlook countless cases of sexual harassment but has actually monetized many women’s acceptance of such behaviour. Being a “regular” and “tip[ping] well” makes the norm “just deal[ing] with it.”
    Would getting rid of the culture of tipping encourage women to rise against a system which monetizes their abuse? Or would it simply prevent many youth and students from gaining the funds they need to live in an urban environment. In any case, there is clearly a problem here that is not being addressed in an effective manner, explicitly because the people who are not willing to accept this harassment are paid significantly less for their untrained labour.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think that the service industry is a perfect example of larger issues that affect men and women in our society. I agree with both of you in regards to danger of the service industry normalizing sexual harassment. While women are harassed much more often then men in this industry, I think that this is merely a symptom of a larger issue that boils down to most people not understanding consent, or the legal definition of sexual assault. And it's true, this industry does capitalize on this issue and they use it to sell their products. In my experience the harassment in the workplace is not only an issue with customers, but also an issue between employees. Regardless of dress code I have seen employees harassed over the years, and I think that part of this stems from a lack of education on the part of the employers. If sexual assault is taken seriously in a place of work and there are policies in place then I imagine that an employee would be less likely to accept unwanted harassment. I think this might be a more effective way to combat assault between employees, and in employee/customer relationships.

    This is kind of off topic a bit but I am thinking about some of our other readings this week too and noticed that there are no statistics about trans employees, or any non-binary folk in the service industry. I think the fact that many restaurants are so focused on the difference between male and female employees (right down to the way they are supposed to dress) might discourage this kind of diversity. I'm also sure that there would be a lot of sexual harassment in some of these places if anyone who wasn't cis-gendered worked there. Just something to think about... and a topic that I would like to look into more.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you for touching on this subject. I agree that if unwanted touching was classified as sexual assault for women every single one of us or very close to, would fit into that category. I think the response men have to other men hitting on them if based in fear. Fear because they do not understand, fear that they are giving off a 'gay vibe', fear that other guys will see them and think they are gay. Whereas when we get hit on we are women and obviously want the attention. *discouraged sigh*

    ReplyDelete