Friday 25 September 2015

Desensitization to Rape in Society



After reading Andrea Dworkins piece, I was moved by how much her writing spoke to me and how I identify as a feminist. What I thought was the most important about her article was how she included men into the argument, and basically shut down the argument of “but not ALL men do it.” Yes it is true that not all men rape, but these men who claim that this fight is not their fight are missing so many of the critical points that feminists have been making for so many years.
A quote that stuck out for me in the article was when Dworkin referred to the defence of, “well it happens to men too.” She says, “That is not the equality we are struggling for. We could change our strategy and say: well, okay, we want equality; we'll stick something up the ass of a man every three minutes.”(Dworkin, 1983) Yes, rape happens to men, and yes there are male strippers and male prostitutes but that does not change the statistics on male to female related rapes and it does not mean that our society is not in drastic need of changing. Dworkin goes on to explain that “[equality] cannot coexist with rape. It cannot. And it cannot coexist with pornography or with prostitution or with the economic degradation of women on any level, in any way” (Dworkin, 1983) and I think this relates to Mackinnon’s concept of the men being “systematically conditioned not even to notice what women want. Especially if they consume pornography.”(Mackinnon, 1989)  Both these statements made me think of the desensitization that our society is exposed to because of the “rape fantasy” that is exploited by the porn industry. It is because of this desensitization that the defence of the perpetrator “not knowing” that the woman did not consent and therefore did not have the required mens rea to be found guilty of a rape charge continues to happen in the courts. If men are exposed to dialect where no really doesn’t mean no, it means she likes it rough, it is not hard to see why the courts continue to view this as a meaningful defence. The shock value has been lost because we are exposed to it on a daily basis. We are exposed to it not only in porn, but also in advertisements and in the “corpse chic” that Cressida Heyes talked of in her lecture. When the idea of rape loses its shock value, and men are systematically taught that no doesn’t always mean no, the argument of “not all men” loses any little value that it might have had.
Furthermore, what I find most troubling about this argument is just how sad it is. If you cannot tell the difference between a woman that wants to have sex with you, and a woman who is not consenting to sex, what does that say about you as a human? I find it sad that this can be used as an argument, and I find it sad that society does not see how debilitating this is to both genders.
Finally, when we talked in class about whether or not men fear feminism, I believe they do and I believe that they have good reason too. I believe that this fear is deep seated in the idea they themselves will be treated as they treat women. And that would be a scary thought for any man (yes, all men).

2 comments:

  1. I totally agree with everything you said Karah, and I think you outlined some really good points. When reading through Dworkin’s speech, a part of me was definitely like “woah this is a lot to grasp” but at the same time I wanted to raise my fist in the air because she had perfectly articulated so many things I’ve wanted to say but never could find the words to say it so well.

    I’ve found myself in a handful discussions that come to a halt when the other individual states that “not all men rape”, and “yes I see your point, and trust me I’m so sorry”. I’ve always felt that sorry was never enough, and Dworkin made some damn good points about that. No, sorry is not enough and no, that is not the end of your fight either. There is so much more that can be done that is purposeful and constructive. It’s scary that what is displayed as hot forceful sex in porn, the media, and countless movies and tv shows, is something that continues to enforce the concept of sexy rape. Sexy rape that is perceived to not actually be rape, because saying “no” doesn’t seem to be taken seriously. This perpetuates the illegitimacy of not giving consent, which has become more and more systematic.

    I’m glad that you stated that men should fear feminism. They should fear the loss of this power war, the loss of their opportunity to deny “no”. This speech still needs to be heard.

    ReplyDelete
  2. In thinking about the ways that men are discussed in relation to rape, I think the aspect of statistics, which you mentioned, is important. However, I think it is important to recognize that the reason for this disparity is the systemic power structures at work, which is part of what Dworkin is considering in her article. Even in situations in which men are raped, or experience sexual assault, these power structures remain, and inform the situation. It is telling that the majority of rapes against men are also perpetrated by men, in that this is a perpetuation of the existing gender roles and power dynamics. Further, this reinforces the perception of rape as a technique of control and power. In this way, though, I see how the lines of consent so regularly become confused in our society.

    It is interesting too, as you mentioned in your last paragraph, to consider the fear of feminism held by many men. In some ways, the fear of reduced power is not inaccurate. While it is usually posited that women and other marginalized groups are seeking equality with the dominant hegemonic class, Dworkin notes that the reality is that some of the powers people in that position hold should be completely relinquished as part of the feminist agenda. I'm sure it is terrifying for men to consider a world in which their power over others is not guaranteed.

    ReplyDelete