What I like most about both Truitt’s blog post and the Weiss
article was the fact that they touched on very important issues about rape
culture, and how we can close some of the gaps of the discourse surrounding
rape. As Truitt mentions, looking at the phenomenon of rape in a one sided way,
“it’s easy and understandable to slip into essentialist language when talking
about the issue, to paint all victims as women and all perpetrators as men. By
missing parts of the reality, we’ve left space for folks like Men’s Rights
Activists to fill” (Truitt, 2013). While Weiss’ article attempts to remove this
space and put research into an area that desperately needs it, she fails to
acknowledge the very different experiences of men and women when it comes to
instances of unwanted sexual touching, and the difference in how society has
taught men and women to react to these instances.
What I
found most problematic about the Weiss article were some of the victim’s
responses that were used to describe men’s experience with sexual assault, and
definitely had to “check myself” many times as Randi described in class. While
defining sexual assault in “examining men’s sexual victimization experiences,”
(Weiss, 2010), Weiss states that “NCVS narrative also reveal that men are
victimized by a broad range of sexual assaults that include incidents in which
they are grabbed or touched “inappropriately,” sexually threatened, or even
“flashed” (Weiss, 2010). What I find troubling about including being touched
“inappropriately” or being “flashed” is that many women deal with instances
like this quite often. I am in no way attempting to minimize these men’s
experiences, because no one should be touched or grabbed if they do not welcome
it, but if we are to label inappropriate grabbing and touching as sexual
assault then the statistics for women who have been sexually assaulted would
sky rocket.
While these
are not Canadian statistics, MSNBC did a study on sexual harassment in the
restaurant industry and found “found ‘endemic’ levels of harassment,
with more than 90% of women working in restaurants as tipped employees dealing
with it in some form” (MSNBC, 2014). As someone who works in the service
industry, these numbers do not surprise me. Being “grabbed or touched
inappropriately” is a regular Friday/Saturday night, with past Managers
explaining that “I should take it as a compliment” or, “He’s a regular and he
tips well, just deal with it.” The
report also found that “uniforms play a huge role in setting the tone in a
restaurant,” (MSNBC, 2014) and that more revealing uniforms tended to bring
about sexual harassment. In light of this, it is not atypical, and I would
argue that it is the norm, to see female servers dressed in as little clothing
as possible. Drawing from the Bar that I currently work at, the managers have
set the bar low for sexualizing their employees as “G.I. Joe and his Hoes” will
be the costumes for our servers this upcoming Halloween.
While
I think that Weiss’ article attempts to close the gap that Truitt speaks about
in her blog, and covers a topic that truly needs more research done on it, I
feel that some of her descriptions could be stretching it. Yes we need to tell
men that this is not okay when done to them, conversely, we need to teach men
that it is not okay when they do the same to women. Most importantly, we need
to continue to tell women that being grabbed or touched inappropriately is not
something that they should have to put up with in their everyday lives.
Thank you for touching on this subject. I agree that if unwanted touching was classified as sexual assault for women every single one of us or very close to, would fit into that category. I think the response men have to other men hitting on them if based in fear. Fear because they do not understand, fear that they are giving off a 'gay vibe', fear that other guys will see them and think they are gay. Whereas when we get hit on we are women and obviously want the attention. *discouraged sigh*
ReplyDelete